Iran Rejects Trump’s Direct Talks Offer, Citing Threats and Mistrust Amid Nuclear Tensions
In a fresh blow to diplomatic hopes, Iran has firmly turned down former U.S. President Donald Trump’s call for direct nuclear talks, arguing that dialogue under threat is both pointless and contradictory. The refusal comes amid rising tensions between Tehran and Washington, with Iran accusing the United States of using coercive language and failing to show genuine commitment to peaceful diplomacy.
Last month, Trump sent a letter to Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei through the United Arab Emirates, suggesting direct negotiations to resolve longstanding concerns over Iran’s nuclear program. The letter included a stern warning that if diplomacy failed, military options were still on the table. Despite this, Trump recently doubled down on his stance, stating that face-to-face talks would be “faster” and more effective than negotiations through intermediaries.
But Tehran isn’t buying it.
Iran’s top diplomat Abbas Araghchi dismissed the proposal outright, calling direct talks meaningless with a country that issues threats and contradicts itself. “We are dealing with a government that constantly violates international norms by threatening the use of force,” Araghchi said. He added that Iran remains open to indirect negotiations but emphasized the need for mutual respect and seriousness in diplomacy.
President Masoud Pezeshkian echoed this sentiment, questioning the logic of negotiating with a nation that simultaneously speaks of peace while brandishing threats. “If you truly want dialogue, then why the constant pressure and threats?” he asked, reiterating Iran’s willingness to engage on equal footing but only in an environment free of coercion.
Iran's leaders made it clear they are not rejecting diplomacy altogether—they're rejecting the form and tone in which it's being offered.
Iran’s response, delivered through Oman, stressed its preference for peace and regional stability. General Mohammad Bagheri, Chief of Staff of Iran’s armed forces, underlined that while Iran does not seek war, it stands fully prepared to defend itself if provoked.
This diplomatic standoff comes against the backdrop of the long-dormant 2015 nuclear agreement, formally known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). The deal, signed between Iran and six world powers, limited Iran’s nuclear activities in exchange for the lifting of economic sanctions. However, in 2018, Trump unilaterally withdrew from the pact and reinstated harsh sanctions, pushing Iran to gradually abandon its commitments and ramp up its nuclear program.
While Western powers continue to accuse Tehran of trying to build nuclear weapons, Iran insists its program is strictly for civilian purposes. Still, the pressure is mounting. In a stark warning, Ali Larijani, a senior adviser to Ayatollah Khamenei, cautioned that while Iran does not desire nuclear weapons, it might be forced to pursue them if the country faces an existential threat.
At the heart of Iran’s rejection is a deep-seated mistrust rooted in decades of hostility, regime change efforts, sanctions, and broken agreements. Iranian officials see direct talks, especially with Trump—who dismantled the JCPOA—as unreliable and laden with bad faith. For them, returning to the table without guarantees or mutual respect is a trap, not a solution.
In their view, negotiating under threat is not diplomacy—it’s blackmail. That’s why, despite being open to indirect dialogue through trusted intermediaries like Oman, Iran is standing firm on refusing direct engagement for now.
Iran’s rebuff to Trump’s direct diplomacy reflects not just a rejection of one man’s offer, but a broader skepticism about American intentions. As both sides dig in, the window for a peaceful, negotiated solution remains open—but only barely. Without a shift in tone, trust, and tactics, the road to resolving the nuclear issue may remain blocked by a wall of suspicion and strategic calculation.