Indian-Made Artillery Shells Secretly Reach Ukraine, Angering Russia Amid Arms Trade Controversy

India’s artillery shells, manufactured by state-owned defense companies, have found their way into Ukraine’s battlefield, sparking anger from Russia. Though India has not directly supplied arms to Ukraine, several European countries, including Italy and the Czech Republic, have acted as intermediaries, transferring Indian-made munitions to Kyiv. This development has raised concerns in Moscow, which views the transactions as a breach of trust by one of its key strategic partners.

The shells, originally sold to European defense contractors, were meant for use in their own defense systems. However, customs data analyzed by Reuters revealed that these artillery shells, including 155mm L15A1 rounds, have ended up in Ukraine as part of its war effort against Russia. Indian regulations prohibit the re-export of weaponry to unintended users, but European countries like Italy, Spain, and the Czech Republic have circumvented this by shipping Indian arms to Ukraine without New Delhi’s intervention.

Russia, a long-time arms supplier to India, raised the issue multiple times, most recently during a July 2024 meeting between Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and India’s External Affairs Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar. Moscow expressed its dissatisfaction, particularly over Indian munitions being used by the Ukrainian forces. However, India has remained largely silent on the matter, with no action taken to stop these transfers.

Indian arms manufacturers like Yantra India and Munitions India have been at the forefront of this quiet surge in arms exports. Data shows that the export of munitions components to countries like Italy, Spain, and the Czech Republic surged from just $2.8 million before the Ukraine war to $135 million by mid-2024. Italian defense contractor MES, which has a strong relationship with Yantra India, played a significant role by purchasing empty shells from India, filling them with explosives, and shipping them to Ukraine. Reports suggest that other Western firms, lacking the capacity to mass-produce artillery shells, relied on Indian suppliers to meet Ukraine's growing demand for ammunition.

This arms trade between India and Europe has placed New Delhi in a precarious position. India, which has maintained a neutral stance in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, faces pressure from both sides. While Russia remains a key defense partner, supplying more than 60% of India’s arms imports, India has also deepened its strategic ties with the U.S. and Europe amid concerns over China’s growing influence. Washington, Ukraine’s biggest supporter, has strengthened its defense relations with India, with the two countries cooperating on military technologies.

India’s defense industry is in a period of rapid expansion. According to Indian Defense Minister Rajnath Singh, India’s defense exports exceeded $2.5 billion in the last fiscal year, and the country aims to raise this to $6 billion by 2029. However, India’s ambitions to become a major arms exporter have collided with its commitments to Russia, with some end-user violations occurring in the rush to expand its footprint in the global arms market.

Despite Russia’s protests, India has shown no signs of slowing down its arms exports. A former top executive at Yantra India stated that India was aware of the situation but chose not to take any action. For New Delhi, the export of ammunition to European countries represents an opportunity to strengthen ties with Western powers while balancing its relations with Moscow. Yet, this balancing act risks complicating India’s future defense partnerships, particularly with Russia.

The situation also highlights the complexity of the global arms trade, where weapons intended for one user often find their way to unintended destinations. In Ukraine’s case, Indian munitions have become a crucial component of its defense against Russian aggression. However, this trade-off has placed India in a delicate geopolitical position, one where its actions—or inactions—are being closely monitored by both sides of the conflict.